A writ petition filed by Binoy challenging a transport authority order was dismissed for non-prosecution as neither part nor any representation appeared before the Court when the case was called.
None
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2016/10TH JYAISHTA, 1938
WP(C).No. 5865 of 2012 (G)
PETITIONER :
BINOY S/O.NADARAJAN, THEKKEVILA B. NIVAS, KANAYANNOOR, CHOTTANIKKARA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR SMT.G.CHITRA
RESPONDENT :
THE JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER SUB REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, TRIPPUNITHURA, PIN-682301.
BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. BOBBY JOHN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31-05-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Mn
A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
=============
W.P. (C) No. 5865 of 2012
===================
Dated this, the 31st day of May, 2016
J U D G M E N T
When the case was called, there was no representation or
appearance for the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE
Rp31/05/2016
//True Copy//
P.S to Judge
BINOY S/O.NADARAJAN
THE JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER
A.M. SHAFFIQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
