The High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam, through Justice Anu Sivaraman, dismissed W.P(C).No. 5692 of 2012 as infructuous without detailed reasoning.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/24TH KARTHIKA, 1938
WP(C).No. 5692 of 2012 (J)
PETITIONER(S):
1. SREEJITH MAROLI, S/O.KUNNUMBRON NANU, THANPULIYIL HOUSE, AYITHARAMAMBARAM (P.O), KUTHUPARAMBA (VIA), KANNUR - 670 643.
2. SUNNY PARATHEPATHIKAL, S/O.P.J.MATHEW, PARATHEPATHIKAL HOUSE, THAYYENI P.O., CHERUPUZHA, KASARAGOD DISTRICT - 670 511.
BY ADV. SRI.MAHESH V RAMAKRISHNAN
RESPONDENT(S):
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, GENERAL EDUCATION (J) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
3. THE DIRECTOR, HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
4. THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15-11-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
ANU SIVARAMAN, J.
W.P(C).No. 5692 of 2012
----------------------------------------------Dated this the 15th November, 2016
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
ANU SIVARAMAN
JUDGE
vgs16/11
Sreejith Maroli
Sunny Parathepathikal
State of Kerala
Secretary to the Government of Kerala, General Education Department
Director, Higher Secondary Education, Thiruvananthapuram
Kerala Public Service Commission
Anu Sivaraman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
