Rajeena v. the Executive Engineer
Case brief
What is this about?
Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on the day of admission without substantive argument or reasoning.
What did the court decide?
None granted.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
FRIDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2016/11TH AGRAHAYANA, 1938
WP(C).No. 5346 of 2016 (P)
PETITIONER :
RAJEENA, D/O.BEERANKUTTY,
THEYYABATTIL HOUSE, THALAKKAD(P.O), TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.JAMSHEED HAFIZ
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD OFFICE TIRUR, TIRUR (P.O), PIN-676 101, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION TIRUR, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD OFFICE TIRUR, TIRUR (P.O), PIN-676 101, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAJEENA
- respondent
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD OFFICE TIRUR
- respondent
THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION TIRUR
- respondent
THE SECRETARY, TANALUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court