A writ petition was filed which was not pressed by the petitioner's counsel. The High Court's order dismissed the petition for not being pressed, leaving no substantive legal proposition to record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/19TH JYAISHTA, 1938
WP(C).No. 510 of 2015 (K)
PETITIONER(S) :
------------------------
PULLATT ELI @ ELIYAMMA, AGED 84 YEARS, W/O.LATE JOSEPH, PULLATT HOUSE, CHEMBANODA, QUILANDY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT,, .NOW RESIDING AT PETTAYIL HOUSE, KEDAVOOR, THAMARASSERY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.R.AVINASH (KUNNATH) SRI.ABDUL RAOOF PALLIPATH
RESPONDENT(S) :
---------------------------
1. THE THAHSILDAR, QUILANDY, TALUK OFFICE, QUILANDY QUILANDY.P.O, KOZHIKODE-673 616.
2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
3. THRESSYAMMA AUGUSTHY, AGED 62 YEARS W/O.AUGUSTHY, MALEPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHEMBANODA, PILLAPERUVANNA, KOZHIKODE-673 528.
R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.GIKKU JACOB
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-06-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
msv/
P.B. SURESH KUMAR, J.
W.P.(C).No. 510 of 2015
Dated this the 9th day of June, 2016
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits
that the writ petition is not pressed. In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
P.B. SURESH KUMAR JUDGE
bpr
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
PULLATT ELI @ ELIYAMMA
THE THAHSILDAR
THE VILLAGE OFFICER
THRESSYAMMA AUGUSTHY
P.B. SURESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
