affidavit, disputing the claims and demands raised made by the petitioner. Among other things, it is stated that as per Clause 9 of Service Rules of Jawahar Bal Bhavan, recognised by GO.(MS.) No. 44/97/CAD, dated 31.07.1997, the vacancy against the permanent post shall be filled up from the candidates sponsored by employment exchange. In the absence of any qualified hands, the appointment can be made by conducting interview of candidates, who apply on advertisement being published in the news papers. However, in the case at hand, the kung-fu instruction is not a subject recognised by government and thereby, there is no such post in the Jawahar Bal Bhavan. Therefore, petitioner was paid from the available funds of Jawahar Bal Bhavan. It is also stated, only when the state regularise the post of kung-fu instructor, he could be regularised against that post, following procedure prescribed by Clause 9 of Service Rules of Jawahar Bal Bhavan. Therefore, it is contended, petitioner has not made out a case warranting