Dismissed

Naresh Kumar v. Cochin University of Science and Technology

Kerala HC21 Mar 2016WP(C)/4435/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought directions to finalize the valuation of supplementary examination answer papers. The respondent counsel assented to a timeline for completion. The court dismissed the writ petition, finding it unnecessary to issue any directions given the submission made.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed; the court declines to issue further directions as the respondent has assured completion of valuation.

Naresh Kumar Vs Cochin University of Science and… — Education and Admissions | Kerala HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE

¶4

MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH 2016/1ST CHAITHRA, 1938

¶5

WP(C).No. 4435 of 2016 (D)

¶6

PETITIONER(S):

¶7

NARESH KUMAR, S/O.BHIKHARI SAH, C/O.ABDULLA M.K., MANAKATTIL HOUSE, AGED 22 YEARS HIDAYATH NAGAR, HMT P.O., KALAMASSERY ERNAKULAM, COCHIN - 683 503.

¶8

BY ADVS.SRI.SHERRY J. THOMAS SMT.THAMANA BAI

¶9

RESPONDENT(S):

¶10

1. COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CUSAT CAMPUS, KALAMASSERY - 683 104.

¶11

2. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, CUSAT, KALAMASSERY - 683 104.

¶12

3. THE PLACEMENT CELL OFFICER, SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING, CUSAT, KALAMASSERY - 683 104.

¶13

R1&2 BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI, SC, COCHIN UNIVERSITY

¶14

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21-03-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

WP(C).No. 4435 of 2016 (D) ---------------------------

¶16

APPENDIX

¶17

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

¶18

EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE HALL TICKET OF THE PETITIONER EXCT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE GRADE CARD OF THE PETITIONER. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 21/01/2016 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 29/01/2016 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND REPONDENT.

¶19

EXT.P5: THE TRUE COPY OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT GIVEN BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNIVERSITY.

¶20

EXT.P5A: THE TRUE COPY OF REPLY UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT GIVEN BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNIVERSITY.

¶21

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS nil

//True Copy//

P.S to Judge

A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

¶26

============= W.P. (C) No. 4435 of 2016

¶27

===================

¶28

Dated this, the 21^st day of March, 2016

¶29

J U D G M E N T

¶30

This writ petition has been filed inter alia seeking for a direction to value the answer papers of Supplementary Examinations and other reliefs are also sought for. With reference to the relief other than the valuation, I do not think that this Court will be justified in issuing any directions.

¶31

Learned counsel appearing for the University submits that the valuation will be completed by the second week of April, 2016. I take on record the aforesaid submission and close the writ petition.

¶32

Sd/-

¶33

A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE

¶34

Rp21/3/2015

¶35

//True Copy//

¶36

PS to Judge

Naresh Kumar v. Cochin University of Science and Technology

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naresh Kumar v. Cochin University of Science and Technology

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ezhupunna North Coir Co.Op.Society Vs Asst.Engineer

Neerolpan Valeed Vs the Intelligence Officer (Ib)

V.M.Latha Vs the Deputy Director

K.a.Johnson Vs v.Raju

K. Surendran Vs Chithara Grama Panchayat

Shemeela Vs the Secretary, Asamannoor Grama Panchayath