The petitioner filed a writ petition. The court observed that the issues raised were already covered in a previous judgment involving the same petitioner (Annamma Poulose v. District Collector). Consequently, without detailed analysis, the writ petition was dismissed based on the dictum laid down in that referenced judgment.
Writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2016/6TH POUSHA, 1938
WP(C).No. 41276 of 2016 (H)
PETITIONER:
FRANCIS, S/O. VARKEY, AGED 57 YEARS, KUNNATHOOR,
PUTHENVELIKKARA P.O., PUTHENVELIKKARA VILLAGE, PARAVUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.JITHIN VARGHESE
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY, ERNAKULAM -682030.
2. THE DIRECTOR, MINING AND GEOLOGY, OFFICE OF THE MINING AND GEOLOGY, KESAVADASAPURAM, PATTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
3. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN-695001.
4. PUTHENVELIKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683594 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
5. THE SECRETARY, PUTHENVELIKKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT – 683594.
R BY SMT.C.S.SHEEJA SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-12-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 41276 of 2016 (H)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :-
EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 25.4.2016 ISSUED BY THE FIFTH RESPONDENT ON BEHALF OF FOURTH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 10.11.2016 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :- NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
rkj
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, J.
============================ W.P.(C)No.41276 of 2016
============================
Dated this the 27th day of December, 2016
JUDGMENT
The issues raised in this writ petition have been covered against the petitioner in the judgment of this Court reported in Annamma Poulose v. District Collector [W.P.(C) No.16763/2016].
In such circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed following the dictum laid down in the judgment aforementioned.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, JUDGE
rkj
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Annamma Poulose v. District CollectorReferred¶32
Annamma Poulose v. District Collector
Francis
The District Geologist
The Director, Mining and Geology
The State of Kerala
Puthenvellikkara Grama Panchayath
The Secretary, Puthenvellikkara Grama Panchayath
Devan Ramachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
