The petitioner filed this writ petition claiming subsequent developments rendered it infructuous. The court accepted this submission and dismissed the petition on the ground of being infructuous.
Approval of the submission that the writ petition has become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2016/19TH CHAITHRA, 1938
WP(C).No. 35711 of 2015 (L)
PETITIONER(S):
SUNNY GEORGE RESIDING AT IDINJAKUZHIYIL HOUSE CHELAKKODE.P.O PAZHAYANNUR REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER AND POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER E.I.GEORGE
BY ADVS. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS SMT.BINDUDAS M. (ADV.COMMNR.)
RESPONDENT(S):
PAZHAYANNUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH PAZHAYANNUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-680 587
BY ADV. SMT.DEEPTHI S.MENON
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-04-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANU SIVARAMAN, J.
W.P(C).No. 35711 of 2015
Dated this the 8th April, 2016
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous in view of the subsequent developments. This submission is recorded and the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
ANU SIVARAMAN
JUDGE
vgs8/4
Sunny George
Pazhayannur Grama Panchayath
Anu Sivaraman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
