Petitioners challenged non-payment of pay revision benefits. High Court directed the third respondent to consider their representations and pass orders after notice and hearing within two months.
Directed third respondent to consider petitioners' representations and pass orders after notice and hearing within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/27TH KARTHIKA, 1938
WP(C).No. 34861 of 2016 (G)
PETITIONER(S) :
1. JASMINE, AGED 53 YEARS, W/O.SALIM K.S., OFFICER-PURCHASE,
2. K.N.SUNIL KUMAR, MAINTENANCE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL, THE TRAVANCORE - COCHIN CHEMICALS LTD., UDYOGAMANDAL P.O., KOCHI.
BY ADV. SRI.S.SUJIN
RESPONDENT(S) :
1. THE TRAVANCORE-COCHIN CHEMICALS LTD., PB NO.4004, UDYOGAMANDAL P.O., KOCHI - 683 501, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE TRAVANCORE-COCHIN CHEMICALS LTD., UDYOGAMANDAL P.O., KOCHI - 683 501.
3. THE DIRECTOR, ADMINISTRATION, HR & T, THE TRAVANCORE-COCHIN CHEMICALS LTD., UDYOGAMANDAL P.O., KOCHI - 683 501.
4. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, HR(W), THE TRAVANCORE-COCHIN CHEMICALS LTD., UDYOGAMANDAL P.O., KOCHI - 683 501.
BY ADVS. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR
SRI.P.GOPINATH SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI SRI.JOSON MANAVALAN SRI.KURYAN THOMAS
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18-11-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd.
WP(C).No. 34861 of 2016 (G)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT SHOWING THE CALCULATION OF THE SALARY OF 1ST PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT SHOWING THE CALCULATION OF THE SALARY OF 2ND PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 02.03.2016.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 27.04.2016 TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 23.07.2016 TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF JOINT REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER ON 20.09.2016.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :
NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.S.TO JUDGE.
Msd.
ANU SIVARAMAN, J.
W.P.(C) No.34861 of 2016
Dated this the 18th day of November, 2016
JUDGMENT
The petitioners have preferred this writ petition
seeking directions to the respondents to rectify the anomaly pointed out by them and to give them benefits of pay revision in the category of workers under the respondents. It is submitted that claiming these benefits, the petitioners had preferred Exts.P4, P5 and P6 representations before the third respondent.
from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Sd/ANU SIVARAMAN, JUDGE
vs
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to pay revision benefits of workers in the respondent company.
Whether the respondent company is directed to consider representations regarding pay revision.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jasmine
K.N. Sunil Kumar
The Travancore-Cochin Chemicals Ltd.
Anu Sivaraman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
