M/S. Dot Peripherals India (P) Ltd. v. Asst. Commissioner (Appeals)
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petitioner sought redress regarding recovery steps during pending appeal. The High Court held that in pending appeals, recovery must stay and directed the appellate authority to decide the stay petition within one month. (38 words)
What did the court decide?
The 2nd respondent to consider the stay petition Ext.P4 within one month, and the demand pursuant to Ext.P1 kept in abeyance.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/5TH KARTHIKA, 1938
WP(C).No. 34492 of 2016 (J)
PETITIONER(S):
M/S. DOT PERIPHERALS INDIA (P) LTD., PARAKKULAM, PERINCHERY, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR.RINTO XAVIER.
BY ADVS.SRI.A.KUMAR
SRI.P.J.ANILKUMAR SMTG.MINI(1748) SRI.P.S.SREE PRASAD
RESPONDENT(S):
1. ASST. COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), COMMERCIAL TAXES, THRISSUR - 680 001.
2. SALES TAX APPEALLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM - 682 016.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the recovery of demand pending before the appellate authority should be kept in abeyance?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/s. Dot Peripherals India (P) Ltd.
- respondent
Asst. Commissioner (Appeals), Commercial Taxes, Thrisur
- respondent
Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ernakulam
- respondent
Commercial Tax Officer, 2nd Circle, Thrisur
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court