The Assistant Provident Fund Commnr. v. Iyer & Mahesh
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court at Ernakulam dismissed this writ petition by the EPF Commissioner seeking to quash an Appellate Tribunal order. The court referred to a Division Bench decision holding the original petition non-maintainable but allowed the order without detailed reasoning on merits.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2016/25TH PHALGUNA, 1937
WP(C).No. 31292 of 2009 (F)
PETITIONER(S):
THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEE'S PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION REGIONAL OFFICE,BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.) SMT.T.N.GIRIJA, SC,EPF ORGANISATION
RESPONDENT(S):
1. M/S.IYER & MAHESH REP.BY ITS PROPRIETOR N. MAHESH, S/O. NARAYANAN NARAYANA TOWERS, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -14.
2. G. RAJENDRAN, GOVINDABHAVANAM, VATTAVILA THIRUMALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEE'S PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION REGIONAL OFFICE
- respondent
M/S.IYER & MAHESH
- respondent
G. RAJENDRAN
- respondent
THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court