Learned counsel for the Thrissur Municipal Corporation submitted that in respect of the very same matter a civil suit is pending between the petitioner and respondents 2 to 4. In the above circumstances, no orders are necessary in this writ petition. It is seen that the Tribunal had also taken not of the pendency of the suit between the petitioner and respondents 2 to 4. There is nothing illegal in the order passed by the Tribunal also, which found that the order keeping further proceedings on the basis of the provisional order issued on 24.1.2004 in abeyance was only up to disposal of the pending civil suit and the action of the 4th respondent which was upheld in the order of the Tribunal, there is no circumstances warranting interference with the order Ext.P10. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed.