Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Najeeb.S. Vs Tahsildar Cherthala — Writ and Judicial Review | Kerala HC (2016)

Home
Kerala HC
2016
Najeeb.S. Vs Tahsildar CherthalaNajeeb.S. v. Tahsildar Cherthala

Dismissed

Najeeb.S. v. Tahsildar Cherthala

Kerala HC4 Apr 2016WP(C)/30196/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner's counsel submitted that the matter was no longer maintainable.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V

MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2016/15TH CHAITHRA, 1938

WP(C).No. 30196 of 2009 (T)

PETITIONER(S):

NAJEEB.S, RISWAN VILLA, VATTAYAL WARD, THIRUVAMBADI P.O.,, ALAPPUZHA.

BY ADV. SRI.J.OM PRAKASH

RESPONDENT(S):

THE TAHSILDAR, CHERTHALA.

THE VILLAGE OFFICER,

THANNEERMUKKOM NORTH VILLAGE, CHERTHALA.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. VIJU THOMAS

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
NAJEEB.S
respondent
THE TAHSILDAR, CHERTHALA
respondent
THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THANNEERMUKKOM NORTH VILLAGE, CHERTHALA

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Kerala HC
Decided on: 4 Apr 2016 · April
Registered: 23 Oct 2009
Case no.: WP(C)/30196/2009

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Raja Vijayaraghavan V

Salju Vs State of Kerala
31 Mar 2016
Solvin K.Wilson Vs the State of Kerala
31 Mar 2016
Seema Mohan Vs the State of Kerala
31 Mar 2016
C.S.Shammi Vs Govt.of Kerala and Others
4 Apr 2016

Cite this judgement

Najeeb.S. v. Tahsildar Cherthala, WP(C)/30196/2009 (KL), decided on 4 April 2016.

The High Court of Kerala publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

A writ petition was dismissed as infructuous following the submission by the petitioner's counsel that the petition had become devoid of any legitimate cause of action or utility.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-04-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN.V., J

W.P.(C).30196 of 2009

- - - - Dated 4^th April, 2016

JUDGMENT

When the matter was taken up for hearing,

the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous.

Recording the aforesaid submission, the

writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN.V. Judge

Mrcs/4.4.2016

//True Copy//

P.S.To Judge

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V

CNR

KLHC010717822009

Topic

Writ and Judicial Review

Bench

Raja Vijayaraghavan V

Disposal

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

K.Lakshmi Vs Kottacherry Beedi Workers Industrial

4 Apr 2016

A.Thankappan Vs K.S.R.T.C

4 Apr 2016