“In the case in hand, after the receipt of the Disciplinary Authority's show cause notice, the petitioner repeated all his contentions as were placed before the Enquiry Officer. Even assuming that with such an opportunity and also with further opportunity of personal hearing, the petitioner had exhausted himself of all his contentions as to any reason on which the disciplinary authority ought not to disagree with the findings of the Enquiry Officer, it is absolutely necessary that the final decision of the Disciplinary Authority, disagreeing with the findings of the Enquiry Officer reflects the reasons for such disagreement. The impugned order, by which the Disciplinary Authority disagreed with the findings of the Enquiry Officer, is the mere repetition that the entire materials have been looked into and the materials on record show that the petitioner was guilty. No specific reasons have been stated in the impugned order of the Disciplinary Authority pointing out the materials in the enquiry, on the basis of which, the findings of the Enquiry Officer is being reversed or disagreed to. The views of the Disciplinary Authority in such a proceedings on the basis of the materials on record, is something that should reflect in the ultimate decision. That speaking order should contain the specific reasons with
