C. Najeeb v. Kse Board
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging an electricity bill for non-prosecution as the counsel had long ago relinquished the vakkalat and the petitioner failed to appear despite repeated postings.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner left in status quo and wrongful recovery to the extent of Ext.P19 order and Ext.P20 bill
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
THURSDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/28TH JYAISHTA, 1937
WP(C).No. 2782 of 2006 (F)
PETITIONER(S) :
C. NAJEEB, CHICAGO PLAZA, RAJAJI ROAD, ERNAKULAM COCHIN-682035.
BY ADV. SRI.TOM K.THOMAS
RESPONDENT(S) :
1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VAIDYUTHI BHAVANAM PATTOM, TRIVANDRUM-695004.
2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION COLLEGE, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ERNAKULAM.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C. Najeel
- respondent
The Kerala State Electricity Board
Coram
V. Chitambaresh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court