George v. Beena Benny
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/19TH JYAISHTA, 1938
WP(C).No. 2780 of 2009 (E)
AGAINST THE ORDER IN OPMV 183/2007 of MACT MUVATTUPUZHA DATED 19-01-2009
PETITIONER(S):
GEORGE, S/O.CHERIAN,
KURUNNAPILLIL HOUSE, VARAPATTY VILLAGE, KOTHAMANGALAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE SRI.THOMAS T.VARGHESE
RESPONDENT(S):
BEENA BENNY, W/O.BENNY PATHROSE, CHERUPANDALIL HOUSE, MEKKADAMBU P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA.
R,R1 BY ADV. SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.) R,R1 BY ADV. SRI.S.SUJIN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09-06-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
das
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
W.P.(C). No. 2780 of 2009
===================================================== Dated this the 9th day of June, 2016
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition
is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE
das/09.06.2016
// True copy //
PA to Judge
GEORGE, S/O.CHERIAN
BEENA BENNY
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court