pending realisation from the petitioner, no notice has been served on the petitioner by the DDE before the liability was fixed. Though the petitioner had preferred a representation before the DDE pointing out the factual aspects of the matter, no consideration of such representation is apparent from the records in this case. The counter affidavit filed by the 3rd respondent also does not disclose any consideration of the objection of the petitioner. There has, therefore, been no quantification of liability with notice to the petitioner as required by law. The procedure clearly set out in Part III of the KSR with regard to fixation of liability has been observed in its breech. In the above circumstances, I am of the view that Ext.P14 liability certificate which was issued without quantifying and intimating the liabilities to the petitioner is bad in law. Ext.P14 is, therefore, set aside.