Dismissed

Baburaj P.T. v. University of Calicut

Kerala HC4 Jan 2016WP(C)/2631/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition challenged the rejection of the petitioner's application for the post of Professor of Education due to lack of research guidance experience. The High Court of Kerala dismissed the petition as the selection process concluded in 2009. The Court found no reason to interfere. This is a dismissed order.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed as no further steps were taken in the matter after the selection was finalised in 2009.

Baburaj P.T. Vs University of Calicut — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Kerala HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

¶4

MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/14TH POUSHA, 1937

¶5

WP(C).No. 2631 of 2009 (L)

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

BABURAJ.P.T., SENIOR LECTURER, SCHOOL OF BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE, MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS P.O., KOTTAYAM (RESIDING AT PALAMKUNNIL HOUSE, GANDHI NAGAR P.O. KOTTAYAM 686 008.

¶8

BY SRI.BABURAJ.P.T.(PARTY)

¶9

RESPONDENTS:

¶10

1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-673 635.

¶11

2. SELECTION COMMITTEE (PROFESSOR POST) CHAIRED BY VICE CHANCELLOR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., PIN 673 635. 3. SCREENING COMMITTEE, (PROFESSOR POST) REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., PIN-673 635.

¶12

R,R1-3 BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW R BY SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, CALICUT UTY.

¶13

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

RKC

WPC NO.2631/2009

APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

¶18

P1: COPY OF DETAILED NOTIFICATION BEARING NO.GA11/C1/2834/07 DATED 29.7.2008 ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY.

¶19

P2: COPY OF APPLICATION FOR THE POST OF PROFESSOR IN EDUCATION (UNDER RESERVED VATEGORY) SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER IN COMPLIANCE OF EXT.P1 NOTIFICATION.

¶20

P3: COPY OF LETTER O.AD.AII (1)/2606(2)/90 DATED 22.9.2008 ISSUED BY THE M.G.UNIVERSITY TO THE REGISTRAR OF THE CALICUT UNIVERSITY COPY TO THE PETITIONER.

¶21

P4: COPY OF LETTER NO.RT/2834/08 PROF-EDUCATION-PER-(SC)(5) DATED 13.1.2009 ISSUED BY THE DY.REGISTRAR OF CALICUT UNIVERSITY TO THE PETITIONER.

¶22

P5: COPY OF MEMO NO.EB.IX-2/78360/95/EDN-72 DATED 23.3.1996 ISSUED BY THE JOINT REGISTRAR IN CHARGE OF CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, CALICUT UNIVERSITY.

¶23

P6: COPY OF ORDER NO.AC.AII/4/BEH/859/99 DT.7.7.2000 ISSUED BY THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM.

¶24

P7: COPY OF RELEVANT PAGE OF THE NOTIFICATION NO.EB-X/PH.D/95/03 DATED 2.12.2003 OF M.G.UNIVERSITY.

¶25

P8: COPY OF SYNOPSIS OF THE STUDY IN “AETIOLOGICAL FACTORS IN SUICIDAL BEHAVIOUR”

¶26

P9: COPY OF INVITATION LETTER DATED 30.6.2008 ISSUED BY PROFESSOR AND DIRECTOR DR.RAZEENA PADMAM OF M.G.UNIVERSITY, TO THE PETITIONER.

¶27

P10: COPY OF ORDER NO.4721/AII/2008/ACADEMIC DATED 10.11.2008 ISSUED BY THE ASSITANT REGISTRAR, M.G.UNIVERSITY.

¶28

P11: COPY OF CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL OF BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCES DATED 27.8.2008.

¶29

P10: COPY OF CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE MEDICAL BOARD, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOTTAYAM DATED 12.1.2005.

¶30

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL

RKC

TRUE COPY

PA TO JUDGE

P.V.ASHA, J.

W.P.(C) No.2631 of 2009

¶36

Dated this the 4^th day of January, 2016

¶37

JUDGMENT

¶38

This writ petition was filed challenging the rejection of the petitioner's application for appointment to the post of Professor of Education, as per Ext.P4, on the ground that he did not have the experience of research guidance at doctoral level and he did not attach proof for experience as Lecturer. It is seen that the rejection was with respect to a notification issued for selection and appointment to the post of Professor in Education as early as on 29.7.2008. This Court has not granted an interim order. The learned standing counsel submits that the appointment consequent to the notification is already over. As no further steps has been taken in the matter, the petitioner is not entitled to get

¶39

any orders in his favour, in respect of the selection which is already finalised as early as in 2009. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

P.V.ASHA,

JUDGE.

rkc

Baburaj P.T. v. University of Calicut

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baburaj P.T. v. University of Calicut

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sabu K. Vs Md., Kerala Water Authority

Sijo K.T Vs Athirappilly Grama Panchayat

K.M.Bava Vs the State of Kerala

V.Suresh Vs v.M.Gopala Menon

Jijo Vs Mrs.Riya Joshy

P.S.Leela Vs District Treasury Officer,Kakkanad