Akhila v. Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners filed a writ petition complaining about refusal to accept basic tax. The Court directed the Tahsildar to decide the complaints after hearing all affected parties within one month.
What did the court decide?
Directed the Tahsildar to decide on the complaints after hearing all parties within one month.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/26TH MAGHA, 1937
WP(C).No. 2556 of 2016 (T)
PETITIONER(S) :
1. AKHILA W/O.SATHEESAN, MADATHIL HOUSE, THEYYAMPADI POYIL ERANJIPPALAM P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
2. SHEEBA
D/O.SANKARAN, MADATHIL HOUSE, PUTHIYANGADI P.O., KOZHIKODE.
BY ADV. SMT.BIMALA BABY
RESPONDENT(S) :
1. THE TAHSILDAR MANANTHAWADI TALUK,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Tahsildar shall decide on the petitioners' complaints regarding refusal to accept basic tax after hearing all affected persons.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
AKHILA W/O.SATHEESAN
- petitioner
SHEEBA
- respondent
THE TAHSILDAR MANANTHAWADI TALUK
- respondent
THE VILLAGE OFFICER TAVINHAL VILLAGE
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court