Thomas John Bosco v. Pushpam Francis
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution when the petitioner's counsel stated there was no instruction to proceed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/4TH AGRAHAYANA, 1938
WP(C).No. 24648 of 2010 (O)
IA.839/2010 IN OS 59/2008 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,KOLLAM
PETITIONER(S):
THOMAS JOHN BOSCO, S/O.JOHN BOSCO, BOSCO BHAVAN, MUNDAKKAL WEST KOLLAM, PROPRIETOR M/S.BOSCO ENTERPRISES, KOLLAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.V.RAJA SRI.M.T.SURESHKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
PUSHPAM FRANCIS, THEKKEPARAMBIL, RAMANKULANGARA, KAVANADU P.O., KOLLAM.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25-11-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PJ
K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.
W.P.(C)No. 24648 of 2010
Dated this the 25th day of November, 2016
JUDGMENT
When the application came up for hearing today in the defect list for taking steps for the respondent, the counsel for the petitioner submitted that they have no instruction from the party. That shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. So the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry is directed to communicate this judgment to the concerned court, immediately.
Sd/-
(K. Ramakrishnan, Judge)
//True Copy//
P.A. to Judge
ss
THOMAS JOHN BOSCO
PUSHPAM FRANCIS
K. Ramakrishnan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court