Dismissed
Amritha V.K. v. the University of Calicut
Kerala HCWP(C)/24005/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
THURSDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016/27TH SRAVANA, 1938
WP(C).No. 24005 of 2016 (A)
PETITIONER(S):
1. AMRITHA V.K., AGED 21 YEARS, D/O.PANKAJAKSHAN, VADAKKANDY HOUSE, MANGAD P.O., UNNIKULAM VIA,
2. ARYA C.V., AGED 21 YEARS, D/O.SHYLAJA CHATTIYAM VEETTIL HOUSE, KATAMERI P.O.
3. NESLY FEBIN, AGED 23 YEARS, D/O.MUHAMMED K.,KAKKATTUMMAL HOUSE, CHEPPALAYIL, POONOOR, UNNIKULAM P.O.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.NAVAS
SRI.T.K.SASIKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, THENGIPALAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
2. THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695033.
3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC
R2 & R3 BY SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER SRI.C.P.PRADEEP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18-08-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
W.P.(C) No. 24005 of 2016
Dated this the 18th day of August, 2016
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ
petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
A.M. SHAFFIQUE
JUDGE
Scl/17.08.2016
True Copy
PA to Judge
AMRITHA V.K.
ARYA C.V.
NESLY FEBIN
THE UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT
THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION
STATE OF KERALA
A.M. SHAFFIQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court