Dismissed

Prasobh P.Kumar v. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority

Kerala HC22 Jan 2016WP(C)/1898/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a clearance certificate for his permit-operated vehicle. The court directed the respondent to issue the certificate without requiring surrender of the existing permit, provided all dues are cleared, and specified a timeframe for vehicle replacement.

What did the court decide?

Direction to issue clearance certificate without surrender of existing permit upon satisfaction of dues; specified four-month timeline for vehicle replacement.

Prasobh P.Kumar Vs Secretary, Regional… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Kerala HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2016/2ND MAGHA, 1937

¶5

WP(C).No. 1898 of 2016 (J)

¶6

PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:

¶7

PRASOBH P.KUMAR, AGED 30 YEARS KALATHIL PRASOBH BHAVAN, KOTTAMURI.P.O THRIKKODITHANAM, CHANGANACHERRY.

¶8

BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON

¶9

RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:

¶10

THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PATHANAMTHITTA-689645. R BY ADV.K.A.SANJEETHA, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER

¶11

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶12

WP(C).No. 1898 of 2016 (J)

¶13

APPENDIX

¶14

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

¶15

P1 TRUE COPY OF REGULAR PERMIT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RC BOOK OF VEHICLE KL 13 K 3099 P3 TRUE COPY OF REQUEST DATED 11.1.2016 P4 TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT IN W.P(C) 26955/15 DATED 11.9.2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS

¶16

--------------------------------------NIL

TRUE COPY

P.A TO JUDGE

SKS

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

¶21

¶22

W.P (C) No.1898 of 2016

¶23

¶24

Dated this the 22^nd day of January, 2016

¶25

J U D G M E N T

¶26

The petitioner seeks clearance certificate in respect of his vehicle being operated on the basis of a valid route permit.

¶27

Ext.P3 request put in by the petitioner in this regard shall be dealt with by the respondent within two weeks.

¶28

Such clearance certificate can be granted without insisting on the surrender of the existing regular permit in respect of the vehicle. It shall however be ensured that all dues to the Government including check reports and also to the Kerala Motor Transport Workers Welfare Fund Board are satisfied.

¶29

The respondent shall also specify the period not

¶30

exceeding four months within which the petitioner shall replace the vehicle on the route covered by the permit. This is because

¶31

the vehicle now in use requires to be replaced by another to

¶32

resume operations on the route covered by the permit.

¶33

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶34

V.CHITAMBARESH,

¶35

sks Judge.

Prasobh P.Kumar v. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prasobh P.Kumar v. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parvathy Vs Guruvayoor Municipality

Vinod @ Vinodkumar Vs T.P.Krishnankutty and Others

P.J.Jacob Vs Shihabudhin

The Vicar, St.Lazar'S Church Vs the Transport Commissioner

Seema Vinod Vs the Secretary, Regional Transport Authroity

Safeer K. Vs the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority