Dismissed
Aleyamma v. Rayamangalam Grama Panchayath
Kerala HCWP(C)/18780/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:- THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:-
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016/7TH ASWINA, 1938
W.P(C).No.18780 of 2009 (N)
PETITIONER(S):-
ALEYAMMA,56 YEARS, W/O.JOHNSON, NELLAL, PULLUVAZHI P.O., RAYAMANGALAM PANCHAYATH, KURUPPAMPADY.
BY ADV. SRI.P.V.GEORGE(PUTHIYIDAM).
RESPONDENT(S):-
RAYAMANGALAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY SPECIAL GRADE, RAYAMANGALAM P.O., KURUPPAMPADY, ERNAKULAM (DT.)
BY ADV. SRI.N.K.KARNIS.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29-09-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
WP(C).No.18780 of 2009-N
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:-
| EXT.P1 | TRUE COPY OF THE CORRECTION DEED NO.1932/99 REGISTERED AT S.R.O., KURUPPAMPADY. |
|---|---|
| EXT.P2 | TRUE COPY OF THE OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY RESPONDENT TO PETITIONER ON 31.03.1998. |
| EXT.P3 | TRUE COPY OF THE RESIDENTIAL CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY RESPONDENT TO PETITIONER ON 11.02.1998. |
| EXT.P4 | TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 05.06.2009 ISSUED BY RAYAMANGALAM VILLAGE OFFICER. |
| EXT.P5 | TRUE COPY OF THE LOAN SANCTION LETTER DATED 16.06.1999. |
| EXT.P6 | TRUE COPY OF PAGE NUMBER 1 ND 2 OF PETITIONER'S RATION CARD. |
| EXT.P7 | TRUE COPY OF THE IDENTITY CARD DATED 23.03.2009 ISSUED TO PETITIONER BY ELECTORAL REGISTRATION OFFICER. |
| EXT.P8 | TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED NIL, ISSUED BY RESPONDENT. |
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:-
EXT.R4(a) TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REGULARIZATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 5.6.09.
vku/-
[ true copy ]
K. Vinod Chandran, J
---------------------------------------W.P.(C) No.18780 of 2009-N
---------------------------------------Dated this the 29th day of September, 2016
JUDGMENT
The learned Counsel appearing for the respondent-Panchayat submits that the writ petition has become infructuous, since the building has been numbered and the tax is being accepted by the respondent-Panchayat. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that if that be so, the said submission may be recorded and the writ petition closed.
The writ petition is closed, recording the submission made on behalf of the respondent-Panchayat.
Sd/-
K.Vinod Chandran Judge.
vku/-
[ true copy ]
ALEYAMMA
RAYAMANGALAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH
K.VINOD CHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court