Mohammed Sadik Nisar v. Federal Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition was not pressed by counsel for the petitioner and was disposed of by dismissal of the writ petition on the same day as hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/1ST AGRAHAYANA, 1938
WP(C).No. 18668 of 2016 (G)
PETITIONER(S):
MOHAMMED SADIK NISAR, RAHIM MANZIL, THOPPIL VEEDU, PERUMATHURA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 303.
BY ADV. SRI.S.MOHAMMED AL RAFI.
RESPONDENT(S):
FEDERAL BANK LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY AUTHORISED OFFICER/ CHIEF MANAGER, ASSET RECOVERY BRANCH, 4TH FLOOR, FEDERAL TOWERS, STATUE, TRIVANDRUM- 695 001.
BY ADVS. SRI.REJI GEORGE, SRI.BINOY DAVIS.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22-11-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
W.P.(C).No.18668 of 2016
Dated this the 22nd day of November, 2016
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ
petition is not pressed.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE
AV
/True Copy/
P.A to Judge
MOHAMMED SADIK NISAR
FEDERAL BANK LIMITED
A.M. SHAFFIQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court