Disposed

Pullanjiyottu Kizhakke Veettil Kunhi Parvathi Amma v. the District Collector, Kannur

Kerala HC25 May 2016WP(C)/18231/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a writ petition by granting the petitioner's prayer for a time-bound consideration of her Section 28A(3) application filed under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, by the second respondent after an opportunity of hearing.

What did the court decide?

The second respondent directed to consider Ext.P3 application after hearing within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Pullanjiyottu Kizhakke Veettil Kunhi Parvathi Amma Vs the… — Land Acquisition | Kerala HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MAY 2016/4TH JYAISHTA, 1938

¶5

WP(C).No. 18231 of 2016 (D)

¶6

PETITIONER(S):

¶7

PULLANJIYOTTU KIZHAKKE VEETTIL KUNHI PARVATHI AMMA, W/O.LATE KOITHATTA PUTHIYA VETTIL CHINDAN NAIR, RAMANTHALI AMSOM, DESOM, P.O RAMANTHALI-670 308, KANNUR DISTRICT.

¶8

BY ADVS.SRI.M.SASINDRAN SRI.P.K.SUBHASH

¶9

RESPONDENT(S):

¶10

1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR, PIN-670 001.

¶11

2. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA), LAND ACQUISITION, EZHIMALA NAVAL ACADEMY PROJECT, PAYYANNUR-670 307.

¶12

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.JOSEPH GEORGE

¶13

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-05-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

¶15

WP(C).No. 18231 of 2016 (D)

¶16

APPENDIX

¶17

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

¶18

P1: A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 23-6-2005 FILED UNDER SECTION 28A BY THE PETITIONER.

¶19

P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 18-3-2009 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

¶20

P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 28A(3) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT ON 30-3-2009.

¶21

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS

NIL.

/ TRUE COPY /

P.S. TO JUDGE

P.B. SURESH KUMAR, J.

¶27

W.P.(C).No. 18231 of 2016

¶28

Dated this the 25^th day of May, 2016

¶29

JUDGMENT

¶30

The limited prayer made by the learned counsel for

¶31

the petitioner, when this matter was taken up for admission,

¶32

is for a direction to the second respondent to consider Ext.P3 application within a time frame. Ext.P3 is an application filed by the petitioner invoking Section 28A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

¶33

In so far as Ext.P3 is a statutory application, I deem it appropriate to grant the relief sought by the petitioner.

¶34

In the result, the writ petition is disposed of directing

¶35

W.P.(C).No. 18231 of 2016

¶36

-2-

¶37

the second respondent to consider Ext.P3 application, after affording the petitioner an opportunity for hearing, within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner is free to produce a copy of this judgment for compliance before the second respondent.

¶38

Sd/-

¶39

P.B. SURESH KUMAR JUDGE

¶40

bpr

Pullanjiyottu Kizhakke Veettil Kunhi Parvathi Amma v. the District Collector, Kannur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pullanjiyottu Kizhakke Veettil Kunhi Parvathi Amma v. the District Collector, Kannur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Sherwood Technocrats Vs State of Kerala

Firdouse International Trading Co. Vs Union of India

Delta Aggregates and Sand Pvt. Ltd. Vs the General Manager

Manu J.Sivadas Vs the Secretary, Central Board of Secondary Education

Bipin Baby Vs the Superintending Engineer

Anurag Asokan Vs the Union of India