The petitioner filed a writ petition which was declared infructuous by the High Court of Kerala. The court dismissed the petition on that ground without detailed reasoning.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/11TH KARTHIKA, 1938
WP(C).No. 17998 of 2009 (T)
PETITIONER(S) :
RAJASEKHARA KURUP, S/O.RAMAKRISHNA KURUP, SIVASAILAM, THOTTAKONAM MURI, PANDALAM.
BY ADV. SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF
RESPONDENT(S) :
2. TAHSILDAR, KOZHENCHERRY.
3. TAHSILDAR, ADOOR.
4. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA.
7. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PATHANAMTHITTA.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. PRINCY XAVIER BY ADV. SMT.MANJU RAJAN, ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02-11-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd.
P.V.ASHA, J.
W.P.(C) No.17998 of 2009
Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2016
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition
has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
P.V.ASHA JUDGE
rkc
True copy
PA to Judge
Rajasekhara Kurup
District Collector, Pathanamthitta
P.V. Asha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
