Suresh Babu v. Raidco Rep. by M.D.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner challenged some service measure. The court held the petition infructuous and dismissed it without any substantive reasoning or discussion.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MAY 2016/27TH VAISAKHA, 1938
WP(C).No. 1707 of 2011 (K)
PETITIONER :
SURESH BABU, SALES OFFICER (UNDER ORDER OF DEMOTION TO JUNIOR CLERK), CURRY POWDER FACTORY, RAIDCO, MAVILAYI (AGED 38, S/O.P.K.SUKUMARAN,, 'SUJIMA', P.O.KADIRUR, KANNUR).
BY ADVS.SRI.K.S.MADHUSOODANAN SRI.T.V.JAYAKUMAR NAMBOODIRI SRI.THUSHAR NIRMAL SARATHY SRI.M.M.VINOD KUMAR SRI.P.K.RAKESH KUMAR SMT.M.A.RUXANA
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE REGIONAL AGRO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CO-OPERATIVE OF KERALA LTD., (RAIDCO), H.O.KANNUR,
REPRESENTED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, PIN -670 103.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is infructuous and should be dismissed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Suresh Babu
- respondent
The Regional Agro Industrial Development Co-operative of Kerala Ltd., RAIDCO
- respondent
K. Kuttykrishnan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court