The writ petition filed by Aqarat Properties Private Limited seeking directions regarding the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008, was dismissed on the merits as it was not pressed.
no relief granted; petition dismissed as not pressed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2016/11TH ASWINA, 1938
WP(C).No. 15321 of 2014 (M)
PETITIONER(S):
AQARAT PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED, VARIAD P.O, KAKKAVAYAL, WAYAAD-673 122, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR NAZEER AHAMMAD KANHARANDI, SON OF AHAMAD ISMAYIL KANHARANDI, AGED 52 YEARS,VARIAD P.O, KAKKAVAYAL, WAYANAD-673 122.
BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WAYANAD, PIN-673 575.
2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MUTTIL NORTH VILLAGE, WAYANAD DISTRICT, PIN-673122.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.S.KANNAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03-10-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PJ
SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
W.P.(C). NO. 15321 OF 2014
---------------------------------------- Dated this the 03rd day of October, 2016
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the respondent to pass orders on Ext. P4 representation in respect of the issue relating to the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008. Today when the matter is taken up, a not pressed memo is filed by the petitioner seeking to dismiss the writ petition as not pressed.
Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE
DCS
AQARAT PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WAYANAD
THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MUTTIL NORTH VILLAGE
SHAJI P. CHALY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
