Celine Paul v. Union of India etc.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a writ petition which was dismissed as infructuous by a one-line order delivered on 08-09-2016.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016/17TH BHADRA, 1938
WP(C).No. 14809 of 2010 (A) ----------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
CELINE PAUL, AGED 47,D/O. K.U.UTHUPPAN, KAKKATTIL HOUSE, KANAKARI P.O., VIA ETTUMANOOR, (NOW RESIDING AT C/O. T.K.VARGHESE, THURUTHIYIL, HOUSE, THIRUVANKULAM P.O., KADUNGAMANGALAM)
BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFAIRS, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI.
2. THE INDIAN AMBASSADOR, EMBASSY OF INDIA, STATE OF YEMEN, SANA, YEMEN.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
CELINE PAUL
- respondent
UNION OF INDIA
- respondent
THE INDIAN AMBASSADOR
- respondent
PROTECTOR, GENERAL OF EMIGRANTS
- respondent
MR.GALEEB
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court