The court closed the writ petition as infructuous because the challenged provisional order had been made absolute in another writ petition, though the petitioner's contention was left open.
The writ petition was closed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/20TH JYAISHTA, 1938
WP(C).No. 14237 of 2016 (D)
PETITIONER(S):
ABDUL JALEEL K.P S/O. ABDURAHIMAN HAJI, RESIDING AT KAPPUKUTH POTTAMMAL HOUSE, MUNDUPARAMBU P.O., MALAPPURAM-679 357.
BY ADV. SRI.SURAJ.S
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2. THE MALAPPURAM MUNICIPALITY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE, MALAPPURAM-679 223.
R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT C K SHERIN R BY SRI.E.S.M.KABEER,SC,MALAPPURAM MUNICIPA
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10-06-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J
W.P(C) No. 14237 of 2016
Dated this the 10th day of June, 2016
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
writ petition can be closed as infructuous since the provisional
order challenged therein has been made absolute, which has been
challenged in another writ petition. Leaving the contention open
the writ petition is closed as infructuous.
Sd/-
jma
(K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) //true copy//
P.A to Judge
ABDUL JALEEL K.P
THE STATE OF KERALA
THE MALAPPURAM MUNICIPALITY
K. VINOD CHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
