Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Shoukathali Vs Tahsildar,Manjeri — Writ and Judicial Review | Kerala HC (2016)

Home
Kerala HC
2016
Shoukathali Vs Tahsildar,ManjeriShoukathali v. Tahsildar,Manjeri

Dismissed

Shoukathali v. Tahsildar,Manjeri

Kerala HC23 Mar 2016WP(C)/14230/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The writ petition was dismissed as the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter had become infructuous.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V

WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2016/3RD CHAITHRA, 1938

WP(C).No. 14230 of 2008 (R)

PETITIONER(S):

SHOUKATHALI,

S/O.MUHAMMED HAJI,THONDIKKADAVATH HOUSE, KOOTILANGADI P.O.,PADINHATTUMURI,, PERINTHALAMMANNA.

BY ADV. SUNNY MATHEW

RESPONDENT(S):

THE TAHSILDAR,MANAJERI.

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM.

THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANJERI POLICE STATION.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Shoukathali
respondent
The Tahsildar, Manjeri
respondent
State of Kerala

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Kerala HC
Decided on: 23 Mar 2016 · March
Registered: 5 May 2008
Case no.: WP(C)/14230/2008

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Raja Vijayaraghavan V

Rajesh T.P Vs Vineetha
22 Mar 2016
Musthafa K.C. Vs State of Kerala
22 Mar 2016
M/S. Hotel Savoy Bar Vs the State of Kerala
22 Mar 2016
Babu George,S/O.Late George Mathew Vs Muthoor Bankers(Thiruvalla)
23 Mar 2016

Cite this judgement

Shoukathali v. Tahsildar,Manjeri, WP(C)/14230/2008 (KL), decided on 23 March 2016.

The High Court of Kerala publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Raja Vijayaraghavan V

Parties & counsel

Outcome

The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

This judgment records the disposal of a writ petition as infructuous. The court accepted the submission of the petitioner's counsel that the subject matter no longer required judicial intervention and dismissed the petition accordingly.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

THE ANAKAYAM GRMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHEIEF SECRETARY TO

GOVERNMENT,SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.V.P.SATHI

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23-03-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN.V., J

- - - - W.P.(C).14230 of 2008

- - - - Dated 23^rd March, 2016

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. The writ petition is therefore, dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN.V. Judge

Mrcs/23.3.2016

//True Copy//

P.S.To Judge

Raja Vijayaraghavan V

CNR

KLHC010564422008

Topic

Writ and Judicial Review

Bench

Raja Vijayaraghavan V

Disposal

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Dinesh Vs State of Kerala

23 Mar 2016

Joseph Thakarappullil and Another Vs State of Kerala and Others

23 Mar 2016