A writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner's counsel submitted that the matter required no further judicial determination.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
THURSDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH 2016/11TH CHAITHRA, 1938
WP(C).No. 13943 of 2008 (I)
PETITIONER:
MUHAMMED KUNHI, MANAGER,
KHADI SOUBHAGYA III, KANNUR RESIDING AT, SYDARAKATHU HOUSE, THAYYIL POST,, MARAKARKANDI, KANNUR-3.
BY ADVS. SRI.RAJAN P.KALIYATH
SMT.ANUSHA RAMACHANDRAN
RESPONDENT(S):
INDUSTRIES BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS, SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2.THE DIRECTOR, PAYYANNUR KHADI CENTRE, PAYYANNUR.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.TOM K.THOMAS, SC KERALA KHADI &
VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD
BY SRI.K.P.HARISH, SC, KERALA KHADI BOARD
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31-032016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANU SIVARAMAN, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C). No.13943 of 2008
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 31st day of March, 2016
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
sd/-
Anu Sivaraman, Judge
sj31/3
/True Copy/
P.A. to Judge
Muhammed Kunhi
The Kerala Khadi and Village Industries Board
The Director, Payyannur Khadi Centre
Anu Sivaraman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
