Disposed

Shereef M. v. the State of Kerala

Kerala HC11 Mar 2016WP(C)/1194/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the 1st respondent (State of Kerala, represented by the District Educational Officer) to consider a revision application filed by the petitioner regarding non-consideration and afford a hearing opportunity within four months. The writ petition was disposed of without speaking on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 1st respondent to consider the revision and consider the petitioner within four months after affording an opportunity of hearing.

Shereef M. Vs the State of Kerala — Service and Employment | Kerala HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2016/21ST PHALGUNA, 1937

¶5

WP(C).No. 1194 of 2016 (Y)

¶6

PETITIONER(S):

¶7

SHEREEF M. AGED 40 YEARS S/O.ABDUL RAHMAN (LATE)

¶8

HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (SOCIAL STUDIES) SIR SYED HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL KARIMBAM, KARIMBAM PO, TALIPARAMBA KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670 141.

¶9

BY ADVS.SRI.MURALI PALLATH

¶10

SRI.MAHESH V RAMAKRISHNAN

¶11

RESPONDENT(S):

¶12

THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GOVT. SECRETARIAT (ANNEX), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN-695 001.

¶13

THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER

¶14

TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670 141.

¶15

THE MANAGER

¶16

SIR SYED HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KARIMBAM PO TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR, PIN-670 141.

¶17

R1-R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT M J RAJASREE

¶18

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11-03-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

WP(C).No. 1194 of 2016 (Y)

¶20

APPENDIX

¶21

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

¶22

EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DT 15-6-2007 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

¶23

EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF STAFF FIXATION ORDER DT 12-1-2011.

¶24

EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DT 15-6-2015 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN WPC.NO32727/2011

¶25

EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DT 18-2-2015 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN WPC.NO.6039/2012.

¶26

EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DT 01.03.2016 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT

¶27

EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT DT 05.03.2016

¶28

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: NIL

TRUE COPY

P.A TO JUDGE

jma

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J

W.P(C) No. 1194 of 2016

¶35

¶36

Dated this the 11^th day of March, 2016

¶37

J U D G M E N T

¶38

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration

¶39

of Ext.P5 revision filed before the 1^st respondent. The revision is

¶40

dated 01.03.2016.

¶41

In such circumstance, the 1^st respondent definitely

¶42

will have to look at the revision filed before it and consider the

¶43

same in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of four months from the

¶44

date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this

¶45

Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 1^st respondent will consider, in accordance with law.

¶46

The writ petition is disposed of.

¶47

Sd/-

¶48

(K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE)

¶49

jma

¶50

//true copy//

¶51

P.A to Judge

Shereef M. v. the State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shereef M. v. the State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. C.Janardanan Vs Dr. K.Balachandran

U.S.Satheesan Vs Sri.a.P.M.Mohammed Hanish, IAS

S.Unnikrishnan Pillai Vs the Travancore Devaswom Board

Unnikrishnan K.B. Vs the Kerala State Electricity Board

Baby Jackson and Others Vs State of Kerala and Others

Lilly Antony Vs State of Kerala