the provisions of the Transfer of Registry Rules are concerned, transfer of registry can be effected under various circumstances. Even possession of a property can be enquired into and on necessary proof, transfer of registry can be effected in favour of the person, who is in possession of the property for the required period as is contemplated under law. Issuance of pattayam is only a consequential act and the same cannot be termed as an absolute principle in law disabling a person to secure transfer of registry as per the provisions of the Rules, 1966. So also, if the 2nd respondent had any doubt with respect to the property held by the petitioner vis-a-vis., the thandaper account of the additional 4th respondent, 2nd respondent ought to have issued a notice to the said respondent and concluded the proceedings in accordance with the application submitted by the petitioner. 6. The foregoing discussion shows that, Ext.P6 order passed by the 2nd respondent is illegal and arbitrary. Accordingly I set aside the same. Consequentially, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to take on board the
