Dismissed
K.D.Gopalakrishnan v. Greater Cochin Development Authority
Kerala HCWP(C)/11774/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/30TH JYAISHTA, 1938
WP(C).No. 11774 of 2011 (V)
PETITIONER(S):
K.D GOPALAKRISHNAN, SON OF DAMODARAN, VELIYIL HOUSE, ERUVA WEST PATHIYOOR VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT REP. BY HIS DULY APPOINTED POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER VIJAYAN, SON OF GOVINDAN, KRISHNA SREE HOUSE, ERUVA WEST, PATHIYOOR VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT
BY ADVS.SRI.A.BALAGOPALAN SRI.A.RAJAGOPALAN SRI.M.S.IMTHIYAZ AHAMMED
RESPONDENT(S):
GREATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KADAVANTHARA, ERNAKULAM REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
R, BY ADV. SRI.M.K.THANKAPPAN, SC, GCDA R BY ADV. SRI.C.A.MAJEED, GREATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-06-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
==================
W.P.(C) No. 11774 of 2011
==================
Dated this the 20th day of June, 2016 J U D G M E N T
Sri.A.Balagopalan, the learned counsel for the writ
petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous and
the writ petition may be closed accordingly. In the light of the submission made on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
sab
ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE
K.D GOPALAKRISHNAN
GREATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
ALEXANDER THOMAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court