High Court directed the first respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's pending revision petition within two months, after affording an opportunity of hearing. The court expressly stated that it made no observation on the merits.
Directed the first respondent to consider and dispose of the revision petition within two months after hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2016/3RD CHAITHRA, 1938
WP(C).No. 11182 of 2016 (W)
PETITIONER:
N.V.LAL S/O. N.V. GOPALAKRISHNAN [LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT] AID BASIC LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL THRIPPALAMUNDA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR SMT.BINDU SREEDHAR SMT.R.S.MANJULA
RESPONDENTS:
1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM-695 001.
2. THE DEADMASTER ABLP SCHOOL TRIPPALAMUNDA PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 631.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-03-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 11182 of 2016 (W)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :-
EXT.P2 - COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION (WITHOUT ANNEXURES) FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 24.12.2015.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
sp
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
----------------------------------
W.P(C). No.11182 of 2016-W
---------------------------------Dated this the 23rd day of March, 2016
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is aggrieved with the nonconsideration of Ext.P2 revision petition, pending before the first respondent. The prayer of the petitioner is to direct the first respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P2 within a reasonable period.
In such circumstances, there will be a direction to the first respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P2 revision petition of the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, at any rate, within four
W.P(C). No.11182 of 2016-W
2
months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that, this Court has not made any observation on merits, which the first respondent will consider in accordance with law.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE.
//True Copy//
P.A. to Judge.
sp/23/03/16
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the first respondent to consider and dispose of the pending revision petition expeditiously.
N.V.Lal
The State of Kerala
The Deadmaster
K.Vinod Chandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
