Dismissed
Shaji George v. Rta, Thrissur
Kerala HCWA/930/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/21ST MAGHA, 1937
WA. No.930 of 2010 ( ) IN WP(C). No.8125/2008
------------------------------------------AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.8125/2008 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 11-12-2009.
APPELLANT(S)/2ND PETITIONER:
SHAJI GEORGE, UKKEN HOUSE, P.O. ARIPPALAM, THRISSUR.
BY ADVS.SRI.ANIL SIVARAMAN SRI.HARIKRISHNAN RAVINDRAN
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS & PETITIONER NO.1:
1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THRISSUR, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE SECRETARY, RTA, THRISSUR.
3. STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM.
4. E.P. JANARDHANAN, EZHAPARAMBIL HOUSE, PERINJANAM, THRISSUR.
5. M.C. RAJESH, MUNDAKKAL HOUSE, P.O.PARAPPUKKARA, THRISSUR.
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COMEUP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-02-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
KRJ
ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.A No.930 of 2010
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 10th day of February, 2016
JUDGMENT
Ashok Bhushan, CJ
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the writ
appeal has become infructuous. Therefore, the writ appeal is
dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/- A.M.SHAFFIQUE JUDGE
krj.11/2/16
//true copy// P.A to Judge
Shaji George
The Regional Transport Authority, Trissur
E.P. Janardhanan
M.C. Rajesh
Ashok Bhushan
A.M. Shaffique
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court