This writ appeal by the respondent, framed as an appellant in the higher court, was dismissed. The bench relied on a connected precedent (W.A. No. 243 of 2008) which held no ground existed to interfere with the lower court's verdict regarding Section 17B compliance.
Writ appeal dismissed in terms of the judgment in W.A. No. 243 of 2008.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/27TH JYAISHTA, 1938
WA.No. 859 of 2008 (A) IN WP(C).1752/2006
AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A. No. 1691 of 2007 in WP(C) 1752/2006 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 12-12-2007
APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENT::
FRAMATONE CONNECTORS LTD. FORMERLY KNOWN AS FRAMATOME CONNECTORS OEN LTD., ELECTROGIRI, MULANTHURUTHY.
BY ADV. SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER:: --------------------------
NEEMA RAJAN. K. W/O K.N. PREMNATH, KULLANKUDIYIL, B.K. PURAM P.O,PIN-682 308. R BY SRI.A.V.XAVIER
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-06-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON &
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JJ.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandra Menon, J.
This appeal has peen preferred by the respondent in W.P.(C) 1752 of 2006 being aggrieved of the order dated 12.12.2007 in I.A. No. 1691 of 2007. The issue is mainly in relation to compliance of Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act during the pendency of the wit petition.
W.A. No. 859 of 2008
: 2 :
circumstances, this appeal also stands dismissed in terms of the judgment as aforesaid.
Sd/-
P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE
Sd/-
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JUDGE
kmd
/True copy/
P.A. To Judge
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to interfere with the implied finding in connected precedent that no ground existed to interfere with the lower court's verdict.
Whether the present writ appeal requires independent adjudication despite pending connected matters.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Framatone Connectors Ltd.
Neema Rajan K.
P.R. Ramachandra Menon
Anil K. Narendran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
