U.v.Thomas v. U.v.Martin
Case brief
What is this about?
The apex court dismissed the writ appeal filed by U.V. Thomas as infructuous without detailed reasoning.
What did the court decide?
The writ appeal was dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN &
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/26TH MAGHA, 1937
WA.No. 2952 of 2009 ( ) IN WP(C).24912/2009
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 24912/2009 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 28-08-2009
APPELLANT(S)/(PETITIONER):
U.V.THOMAS, SON OF VARKEY, ULLATTIKKULAM HOUSE, MUNJELI, WEST CHALAKUDY THRISSUR.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.K.VENUGOPALAN SRI.SHIBU JOSEPH
RESPONDENTS/(RESPONDENTS:
1. U.V.MARTIN, SON OF VARGHESE, COUNCILLOR, CHALAKUDY MUNICIPALITY, OOKKEN HOUSE CHALAKUDY, THRISSUR.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
U.V.Thomas
- respondent
U.V.Martin
- respondent
M.N.Sasidharan
- respondent
The Secretary, Chalakudy Municipality
- respondent
Sajan Francis
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court