Mary v. Saju
Case brief
What is this about?
This single-paragraph order from the Kerala High Court dismissed Transfer Petition (C) No. 684 of 2015 as infructuous because counsel for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought had no longer been feasible.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016/28TH BHADRA, 1938
Tr.P(C).No. 684 of 2015
GOP 2474/2014 OF FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER(S):
MARY,
W/O. SAJU, KONNAMKUDY HOUSE, AIMURY KARA, KOOVAPADY, ERNAKULAM - 683 544.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR SRI.BABBY KURIAKOSE
RESPONDENT(S):
SAJU, S/O. VARGHESE, KANJIRATHUMMOOTTIL HOUSE, VALAYANCHIRANGARA KARA, ERNAKULAM - 683 556.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow a transfer petition where the petitioner argued the prayers had become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mary
- respondent
Saju
Coram
K.Ramakrishnan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court