Thara v. v.Vivek
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court transferred a pending matrimonial dispute from the Family Court, Nedumangad to the Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram. The transfer was justified based on the petitioner's Post Polio Residual Paralysis, lack of employment, and residence in Thiruvananthapuram, prioritizing the wife's convenience.
What did the court decide?
OP.No.825/2016 pending before Family Court, Nedumangad is withdrawn and transferred to Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram for disposal.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2016/16TH AGRAHAYANA, 1938
Tr.P(C).No. 547 of 2016
OP 825/2016 OF FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD
PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENT:
THARA, AGED 29 YEARS, D/O. LAILA, SHANTHUMOOLA, VARUVILAKATH VEEDU, MALAYINKEEZHU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.G.RANJU MOHAN SMT.M.SANTHI
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER:
V. VIVEK, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O. VASANTHAKUMAR, MULAYAMKODU, KUNNUVILA HOUSING COLONY, KATTAKADA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT ASWATHY BHAVAN, INDOORKONAM, THOONGAMPARA, KANDALA P.O., KATTAKKADA TALUK, VEERANAKKAVU VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the pending matrimonial suit filed at Nedumangad should be transferred to Thiruvananthapuram considering the petitioner's physical disability and residence.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Thara
- respondent
Vivek
Coram
K. Ramakrishnan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court