Jasmine v. M.S.Taha
Case brief
What is this about?
This transfer petition was heard alongside two other related petitions. Upon learning that the matters had been settled between parties and the petitioners wished to withdraw, the court granted permission and dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the petitions is granted and the petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/18TH KARTHIKA, 1938
Tr.P(C).No. 326 of 2014 ()
--------------------------(TO TRANSFER OP.NO. 491/2014 OF FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD TO FAMILY COURT, KOTTARAKKARA)
PETITIONER :
JASMINE, D/O.BASHEER, SINUDAR HOUSE, MANJALLOOR MURI, PATHANAPURAM TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.B.MOHANLAL SRI.M.BOSE
RESPONDENT :
M.S.TAHA, S/O.MUHAMMED SAHIB LABBA, PAYYAPPALLIL TAJ HOUSE, ARASUPARAMBU MURI, NEDUMANGAD TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. PIN-695 016
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jasmine
- respondent
M.S.Taha
Coram
K. Ramakrishnan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court