Shibinu v. Bushara
Case brief
What is this about?
Transfer Petition wherein the court dismissed the petition as infructuous based on a memo filed by the petitioner's counsel.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as infructuous after recording the memo of the petitioner's counsel.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JULY 2016/31ST ASHADHA, 1938
Tr.P(C).No. 13 of 2016 ()
-------------------------TO TRANSFER O.P. NO.623/2015 OF FAMILY COURT, CHAVARA TO FAMILY COURT, ATTINGAL.
PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT:
SHIBINU, S/O. SHAHUL HAMEED, HOUSE NO.KSP-V-349, SHIBINU MANZIL, VAVVAKKAVU P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.M.SREEKUMAR.
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 2 & 3:
1. BUSHRA, D/O. ABDUL WAHAB, VALIYAPALLI THEKKETHIL VEEDU, HOUSE NO.I/352, VAKKOM, CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK - 695 308.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shibinu
- respondent
Bushra
- respondent
The Secretary, Vavakkavu Muslim Jamath
- respondent
The Secretary, Kuttivattom Muslim Jamath
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court