Sethumohan v. Madhumohan
Case brief
What is this about?
The regular second appeal was dismissed for default by the High Court of Kerala because the appellant filed no instruction from the client to pursue the matter.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/23RD MAGHA, 1937
RSA.No. 855 of 2012 ()
----------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS. NO.100/2006 OF SUB COURT, OTTAPPALAM DATED 13/01/2012. AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS. NO.433/2003 OF MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPPALAM DATED 17/08/2006.
APPELLANT/SUPPLEMENTAL 2ND APPELLANT:
SETHUMOHAN, S/O. LATE NARAYANAN EZHUTHACHAN, KOLPATTIL HOUSE, VENGALUR DESOM, P.O. CHERPLASSERY, OTTAPALAM, (PALAKKAD DISTRICT).
BY ADVS.SRI.K.RAMACHANDRAN, SMT.S.JAYASREE.
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
MADHUMOHAN, S/O. LATE NARAYANAN EZHUTHACHAN, KOLPATTIL HOUSE, P.O. CHERPLASSERY, VIA. OTTAPALAM, (PALAKKAD DISTRICT-679 503).
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SETHUMOHAN, S/O. LATE NARAYANAN EZHUTHACHAN
- respondent
MADHUMOHAN, S/O. LATE NARAYANAN EZHUTHACHAN
Coram
PB SURESH KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court