Xavier v. St.Rapheal'S Church
Case brief
What is this about?
All parties settled the dispute via compromise; terms and sketch are incorporated. The Regular Second Appeal was disposed of accordingly by the High Court.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was disposed of based on the compromise entered into by all parties, with terms and sketch forming part of the judgment.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2016/22ND AGRAHAYANA, 1938
RSA.NO. 848 OF 2010 (A)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE IN AS 219/2001 OF II ADDL.DISTRICT COURT,ERNAKULAM DATED 17-07-2003
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE IN OS 467/1993 OF I ADDL. MUNSIFF'S COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 19-06-2001
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 10,11,13 TO 16/DEFENDANTS 10, 11, 13 TO 16:
- XAVIER, S/O.JOSEPH PALLATH, RESIDING AT PALLATH HOUSE, VYTTILA DESOM, POONITHURA VILLAGE, THYKOODAM, KANAYANNOOR TALUK.
- PETER S/O.JOSEPH PALLATH, DO. DO. DO.
- THOMAS, S/O.JOSEPH PALLATH, DO. DO. DO.
- JOHN S/O.JOSEPH PALLATH, DO. DO. DO.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
XAVIER, S/O.JOSEPH PALLATH
- appellant
PETER S/O.JOSEPH PALLATH
- appellant
THOMAS, S/O.JOSEPH PALLATH
- appellant
JOHN S/O.JOSEPH PALLATH
- appellant
RAPHEAL S/O.JOSEPH PALLATH
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court