Santhosh Kumar v. P.K.George
Case brief
What is this about?
This regular second appeal was dismissed for default because the appellant failed to pay the balance court fee within the directed time frame of two weeks from October 28, 2016.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2016/22ND AGRAHAYANA, 1938
RSA.NO. 770 OF 2005 (G)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 24.05.2005 IN A.S. NO. 44/2003 OF THE SUB COURT, PALA.
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27-03-2003 IN O.S. NO. 436/2000 OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, PALA
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
--------------------------------
SANTHOSH KUMAR, AGED 35, S/O.SIVARAMAN NAIR,PARAKATHOTTIYIL HOUSE, KONDADU KARA,VELLILAPPALLY VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK.
BY ADVS.SRI.VARGHESE PREM
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SANTHOSH KUMAR
- respondent
P.K.GEORGE
Coram
K. HARILAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court