All Kerala Pulayar Mahasabha v. Ananeetham Poikayil Swathanthra Dyaiva Sabha
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/15TH MAGHA, 1937
RSA.No. 739 of 2012 (D)
----------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS. NO.51/2010 OF SUB COURT, THIRUVALLA DATED 07/12/2011. AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS. NO.98/2006 OF MUNSIFF COURT, THIRUVALLA DATED 29-09-2010.
APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS:
1. ALL KERALA PULAYAR MAHASABHA, KOMBADI, BRANCH NO:13A, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT.
2. ALL KERALA PULAYAR MAHASABHA, KOMBADI, BRANCH NO:13A, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
3. ALL KERALA PULAYAR MAHASABHA, KOMBADI, BRANCH NO:13B, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT.
4. ALL KERALA PULAYAR MAHASABHA, KOMBADI, BRANCH NO:13B, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
5. ALL KERALA PULAYAR MAHASABHA, KOMBADI, BRANCH NO:44, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT.
6. ALL KERALA PULAYAR MAHASABHA, KOMBADI, BRANCH NO:44, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
7. T.O. SUKUMARAN, AGED 65 YEARS, S/O.ULAKAN, THEKKEUTHIMOOTTIL VEEDU, MANJADI. P.O., MEENTHALAKARA MURI, KUTTAPUZHA VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA TALUK.
BY ADVS.SRI.R.MURALEEDHARAN PILLAI, SRI.P.V.LONACHAN.
RSA.No. 739 of 2012
RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
1. ANANEENTHAM POIKAYIL SWATHANTHRA DYAIVA SABHA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, M.A. JOHN, AGED 67 YEARS, MENAMCHERIL VEEDU, MEENTHALAKARA MURI, KUTTAPPUZHA VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA TALUK, PIN-689 101.
2. BEENY, AGED 75 YEARS, ANCHUTHENGIL VEEDU, MANJADI P.O., MEENTHALAKARA MURI, KUTTAPPUZHA VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA TALUK, PIN-689 101.
3. BABU, AGED 47 YEARS,
BY ADV. SRI.G.UNNIKRISHNAN.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-02-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
R.S.A.No.739 of 2012
Dated this the 4th day of February, 2016
JUDGMENT
There is no representation for the appellants. The
appeal, in the circumstance, is dismissed for default.
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.
smm
ALL KERALA PULAYAR MAHASABHA, KOMBADI, BRANCH NO:13A, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT
ALL KERALA PULAYAR MAHASABHA, KOMBADI, BRANCH NO:13A, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
ALL KERALA PULAYAR MAHASABHA, KOMBADI, BRANCH NO:13B, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT
ALL KERALA PULAYAR MAHASABHA, KOMBADI, BRANCH NO:13B, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
ALL KERALA PULAYAR MAHASABHA, KOMBADI, BRANCH NO:44, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT
ALL KERALA PULAYAR MAHASABHA, KOMBADI, BRANCH NO:44, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
P.B. SURESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court