Dismissed
Baby Issac v. the Vembanad Kuries Private Ltd.
Kerala HCRSA/291/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/17TH POUSHA, 1937
RSA.No. 291 of 2010
AS 363/2007 OF ADDITIIONAL DISTRICT COURT (ADHOC), KOTTAYAM DATED 19-08-2009 OS 46/2007 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, VAIKOM, DATED 25-09-2007
APPELLANT/RESPONDENTS 2 & DEFENDANT 2:
BABY ISSAC.,W/O.ISSAC MATHEW, PUTHENPURAYIL, PALLIPRATHUSSERY KARA, PALLIPRATHUSSERY P.O., VAIKOM VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.SHAJI JOSEPH
RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
THE VEMBANAD KURIES PRIVATE LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, T.D.BALACHANDRAN, S/O.DAMODARAN, KESAVA MANDIRATHIL, NADUVILE MURI, NADUVILE VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.RAJEEV V.KURUP
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-01-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PJ
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
R.S.A.No.291 of 2010
Dated this the 7th day of January, 2016
JUDGMENT
When this matter came up for hearing on 5.1.2016, there was no representation for the appellant. Accordingly, the matter was adjourned to 6.1.2016. On 6.1.2016, the matter was not called for want of time. Accordingly, the case came up in the orders list today. There is no representation for the appellant today also. The appeal, in the circumstance, is dismissed for default.
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.
smm
Baby Issac, W/O Issac Mathew
The VEMBANAD KURIES PRIVATE LIMITED
P.B.Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court