Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Baburaj Vs Lalitha — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Kerala HC (2016)

Home
Kerala HC
2016
Baburaj Vs LalithaBaburaj v. Lalitha

Dismissed

Baburaj v. Lalitha

Kerala HC10 Feb 2016RSA/285/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The second appeal was dismissed for default as the appellants filed no instructions to pursue the matter.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR

WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016/21ST MAGHA, 1937

RSA.No. 285 of 2009 ( )

AS 13/2005 of PRL.SUB COURT, IRINJALAKUDA OS 158/2002 of MUNSIFF COURT, KODUNGALLUR

APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS :

----------------------------------------------------------

1. BABURAJ, AGED 39 YEARS,

S/O. ARYAMPARAMBIL LATE ASOKAN, SREENARAYANAPURAM, VILLAGE,

ALA DESOM, KODUNGALLUR TALUK.

2. GEETHA, AGED 44 YEARS,

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
Baburaj
appellant
Geetha
respondent
Lalitha
respondent
Gangadharan

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Kerala HC
Decided on: 10 Feb 2016 · February
Registered: 13 Mar 2009
Case no.: RSA/285/2009

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from P.b.suresh Kumar

Lissamma Iype Vs Gopalan
9 Feb 2016
The Secretary, Azhikode Grama Vs Ezhuthuveettil Rajalakshmi
9 Feb 2016
Prabhakaran Vs Church of God a Pentecostal Church Rep. by Its Pastor
9 Feb 2016
Parangodan Vs Kumaran
10 Feb 2016

Cite this judgement

Baburaj v. Lalitha, RSA/285/2009 (KL), decided on 10 February 2016.

The High Court of Kerala publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

P.B. Suresh Kumar

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

This appeal was dismissed for default because the learned counsel for the appellants stated that they had received no instructions to pursue the matter.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

D/O. ARYAMPARAMBIL LATE ASOKAN AND SISTER OF

1ST PLAINTIFF, SREENARAYANAPURAM VILLAGE, ALA DESOM,

KODUNGALLUR TALUK.

BY ADV. SRI.VIVEK VARGHESE P.J. SRI. VINODH JOSEPH P.J.

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS :

-------------------------------------------------------------------

1. LALITHA, AGED 74 YEARS, W/O. VALIPARAMBIL GANGADHARAN, SREENARAYANAPURAM, VILLAGE, DESOM, KODUNGALLUR TALUK.

2. GANGADHARAN, AGED 77 YEARS, S/O. VALIPARAMBIL KANNAPPAN, HUSBAND OF 1ST DEFENDANT SREENARAYANAPURAM VILLAGE, DESOM KODUNGALLUR TALUK.

R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.TITUS MANI

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10-02-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

bp

P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.

R.S.A.No.285 of 2009

Dated this the 10^th day of February, 2016

JUDGMENT

The learned Counsel for the appellants submits that he has no instruction from the appellants to pursue this matter. In the light of the said submission, this appeal is dismissed for default.

P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.

smm

P.B. Suresh Kumar

CNR

KLHC010367312009

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

P.b.suresh Kumar

Disposal

DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Santhosh Vs Sreedharan

11 Feb 2016

Narayanan Nair Vs District Collector and Another

11 Feb 2016