Dismissed
M.Ayishakutty Umma v. Maliyakkal Mohammedkutty Haji
Kerala HCRSA/229/2004
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2016/21ST PHALGUNA, 1937
RSA.No. 229 of 2004 ( )
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE IN AS 94/1995 OF DISTRICT COURT, MANJERI DATED 04-08-2003 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE IN OS.NO. 67/1986 OF SUB COURT, MANJERI DATED 30-08-1995
APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS :
1. M.AYISHAKUTTY UMMA, MALIYAKKAL, OZHUKUR DESOM, MORAYOOR AMSOM AND VILLAGE, OZHUKUR POST, ERNAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
2. P. AHAMMEDKUTTY HAJI, NJARAKKODAN, OZHUKUR DESOM, MORAYOOR AMSOM AND VILLAGE, OZHUKUR POST, ERNAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.ANIL SIVARAMAN
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS :
1. MALIYAKKAL MOHAMMED KUTTY HAJI, OZHUKUR DESOM, MORAYOOR AMSOM AND VILLAGE, OZHUKUR POST, ERNAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
2. MALIYAKKAL MAMMUNNI HAJI, OZHUKUR DESOM, MORAYOOR AMSOM AND VILLAGE OZHUKUR POST, ERNAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-03-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Mn
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.
R.S.A.No.229 of 2004
Dated this the 11th day of March , 2016
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants submits that he has no instruction from the appellants to pursue this matter. In the light of the said submission, this appeal is dismissed for default.
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.
smm
M.AYISHAKUTTY UMMA
P. AHAMMEDKUTTY HAJI
MALIYAKKAL MOHAMMED KUTTY HAJI
MALIYAKKAL MAMMUNNI HAJI
P.B.SURESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court